Andrew Huberman· PhD
Use carbon dioxide discard rate because a, it's valuable, it's informative. b, it's zero cost and c, it's something you can track objectively over time.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Use carbon dioxide discard rate because a, it's valuable, it's informative. b, it's zero cost and c, it's something you can track objectively over time.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
You want to do this in the morning when you wake up and keep track just write down in a little book, or maybe just keep tracking your mind of your carbon oxide discard time.