Peter Attia· MD
And yet the 4K has basically allowed us to say the following... The binary cutoff is 7.5%.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And yet the 4K has basically allowed us to say the following... The binary cutoff is 7.5%.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
you can measure for example how much of human caline 2 is in the blood and these are part of more advanced PSA tests like the 4K score or for example the prostate health index these are both mathematical equations that predict probability of aggressive cancers but they're built off of looking at not just the PSA itself but the PSA and how much other types of process PSA exist as well
I always ordered Advanced PSA based testing what does that mean that is testing that involves looking at the percent free PSA and then other things like minus 2 Pro PSA for the prostate health index test or the 4K score
I don't just recheck the PSA I always order Advanced PSA based testing what does that mean that is testing that involves looking at the percent free PSA and then other things like minus two pro PSA for the prostate health index test or the 4K score