The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I love that you mentioned the gut ones there's things like the GI map we can look at calprotectin we can look at some of the stuff interestingly there are some people I see who do GI maps and other gut tests who don't have elevated calprotectin but clearly have stuff going on in their gut I see that a lot
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.