The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
So the physician, interestingly, my physician, let's take him as an example. So he sees me, he says, "How are you feeling?" "I'm feeling great." "Okay, see you next year," that's craziness. Anyway, so I say, okay, stop. Let's talk a little bit about. - Let me educate you, that's what David tells his physician.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Here are the main ones that Andrew and David do. - Yep, and we must. And there's an email that is something like 555, or a phone number, rather, it's 555-5555. I think if they have any complaints, they can just call that number. David will pick up on the east coast business hours and I'll pick up outside of those hours. - But there was the main ones, I would say. Your blood sugar levels, you want to do your HbA1c, which is your average glucose levels over the month. There's CRP, which I mentioned for inflammation.
But there are some main ones, I would say your blood sugar levels, you want to do your HbA1c, which is your average glucose levels over the month, there's CRP which I mentioned for inflammation.