The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
I have an ultrasound machine at the house in the clinic we do ultrasound measurements looking into actual flow we did more MRIs we did an mrv looking at all the vasculature of my upper chest neck and head we did two different tests looking in my eye your eyes have an insight into intracranial pressure for your brain
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
so we did a bunch of additional measurements I have an ultrasound machine at the house in the clinic we do ultrasound measurements looking at actual flow we did more MRIs we did an mrv looking at all the vasculature of my upper chest neck and head we did two different tests looking in my eye your eyes have an insight into intracranial pressure for your brain