The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's wonderful to think about things um kind of nebulously and then it all comes back to what do we care about as we age we care about having an appropriate blood pressure let's call it 120 over 80 we care about having a triglyceride level of 100 or less lower we care about maintaining fasting insulin levels fasting glucose levels anywhere the the cut off they will say is between 70 to 100
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.