Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
and we're now in a situation where we don't know if we're dealing with pure placebo effect or we are dealing with real effects and so because of the lack of the human clinical studies we don't know whether or not we're dealing with a situation of robust Placebo effects
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's a ton of animal data on bpc-157 so much interest in bpc 157 very little if any human data that worries me