The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we've seen it with with stem cells so they've taken stem cells they've tagged them radiographically so you can see them um in the study I read which I can find for you someone had a wrist broken wrist and they gave them intravenous stem cells and 24 hours later when they visualized radiographically those stem cells had AGG at at the sight of the fracture
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.