Andrew Huberman· PhD
I can’t see any reason why a proper multi site RCT of BPC157 done by a few independent groups wouldn’t help clarify any real vs placebo effects.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
I can’t see any reason why a proper multi site RCT of BPC157 done by a few independent groups wouldn’t help clarify any real vs placebo effects.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Human studies desperately needed.
BPC-157 Healing, Patient Experiences
what would be interesting if there were infinite resources would be to do clinical trials for specific use cases so you know I I would actually be very interested in seeing a clinical trial of bpc um for specific type of injury recovery where there's a really clear use case we're going to do an 8 to 12 week trial in post-operative Orthopedic patients where boy if there's one time when you want to see more VF that's probably it and let's compare that to a placebo and actually see are we getting quicker recovery and if so maybe that becomes a use case for it