The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
There is a paper published in the "Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences," which is a very fine journal, showing that that breathing pattern can counter infection from endotoxin and that's because when you have adrenaline in your system and when the spleen is very active, that response is used to counter infection and stress counters infection.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this pattern of breathing is actually a very useful tool.
What happened was the release of epinephrine and norepinephrine from cyclic hyperventilation, which is really what [BREATHING] really is, cyclic hyperventilation, also called Wim Hof breathing, also called tummo breathing, et cetera, that actually had a suppressive action on certain arms of the immune system in a way that allowed people to avoid symptomology such as fever, nausea, et cetera.