Andrew Huberman· PhD
While that is partially true, it is not entirely true and it turns out it's not optimal.
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
While that is partially true, it is not entirely true and it turns out it's not optimal.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Now, it's vitally important to point out that you do not need pharmarmacology. You don't need caffeine. You don't need alpha GPC. You don't need any pharmacologic substance to spike adrenaline unless that's something that you already are doing or that you can do safely or that you know that you can do safely.