What we believe is that it's a signaling molecule to really overexpress the transcriptional activity of oncogenes, transcription factors, and cell cycle genes in a non-hierarchical way.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
What we believe is that it's a signaling molecule to really overexpress the transcriptional activity of oncogenes, transcription factors, and cell cycle genes in a non-hierarchical way.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So what we saw then is like this lactate alone was enough to trigger the expression of all the major oncogenes, transcription factors, and even depress the cell arrest genes.
In 10 and 20, we didn't see much of a difference. but we saw more than in zero. What struck us, and that's kind of hopefully we can show, is that if you cultivate the cancer cells in glucose alone, I give this presentation on Anderson, but so we looked at the cancer cells and we looked at the major oncogenic, I mean, oncogenes, transcription factors, and cycle genes. We had no glucose incubation, no glutamine either. just glucose. And then we added lactate, 10 millimolars and 20 millimolars. So we did RNA extraction and we looked at in the cancer cells where they're without any media, that is no glucose, no glutamine, we didn't see RNA expression.
But what we wanted to see is like could lactate also be a signaling molecule And that's where we observe is like looking at transcriptional activity, looking at the RNA expressions of the key oncogenes, transcription factors, and cell cycle genes and proliferation genes in cancer. Lactate overexpressed them between two and eight fold compared to control.
The glucose media is the same. We just added more lactate. and we see a much amplified response. How much is it amplified with? So it was, for example, this is the no lactate versus the lactate. We can see... That looks like about 2X? Yeah, sometimes even 2X.
So is there an experiment that could be done where you constantly change the media. You have a flux of media that allows them to have a finite amount of glucose, but you constantly strip away the lactate to see what the true baseline level of expression is, absent the lactate as the signal.
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.