Andrew Huberman· PhD
Being sedentary means like you're not moving. That also is an independent risk factor. Even if you do exercise for things like cancer being a big one
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
Being sedentary means like you're not moving. That also is an independent risk factor. Even if you do exercise for things like cancer being a big one
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
Being sedentary is an independent risk factor for cancer Even if you workout...
that is sedentary time when you're s sitting at your desk at your computer for 6 hours or whatever fill in the blank time even though you're going to go to the gym later or maybe you went earlier that time that you're sitting is sedentary and being sedentary is an independent risk factor for cancer
and being sedentary is an independent risk factor for certain diseases like cancer
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.