Andrew Huberman· PhD
That's why you have to empower women to be their own health advocate. Go calculate your lifetime risk of breast cancer.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
That's why you have to empower women to be their own health advocate. Go calculate your lifetime risk of breast cancer.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
So, I always say for women listening to this podcast, if you know your first name, your last name, and your date of birth, you need to know your lifetime risk of breast cancer. It's mandatory.
It's a formula called tireus risk assessment tool. I have it on GMD. It's free. You can literally go on there and calculate your lifetime risk of breast cancer.
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.