Andrew Huberman· PhD
We know that having children before age 40 is protective against certain cancers and he breast cancer in particular and if and if women have uh the BA mutations >> then that number goes way way up.
Loading…
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
We know that having children before age 40 is protective against certain cancers and he breast cancer in particular and if and if women have uh the BA mutations >> then that number goes way way up.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
multiple pregnancies lower the risk of breast cancer one pregnancy transiently increases the risk and then it comes down as time goes by
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.