Peter Attia· MD
and then in the follow study B24 they did okay lumpectomy plus radiation with or without tamoxifen and again it lowered the risk further by about half again
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and then in the follow study B24 they did okay lumpectomy plus radiation with or without tamoxifen and again it lowered the risk further by about half again
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
many women will pass on the anti-estrogen ther thies even as they receive other treatments for dcis
it sounds like the majority of women say I'll take my lumpectomy I'll do a little bit of radiation but I'm not going to take tamoxifen for 5 years
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.