The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
LDH level is such a strong prognostic indicator of survival in addition to M staging uh higher LDH levels tend to reflect more acidity which we talked about why that's problematic tends to reflect faster growing tumors higher turnover higher metabolic activity
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and the reason for that is LDH level is such a strong prognostic indicator of survival in addition to M staging uh higher LDH levels tend to reflect more acidity which we talked about why that's problem IC tends to reflect faster growing tumors higher turnover higher metabolic activity
Whole-body MRI screening in healthy adults produces more incidentaloma harm than cancer-mortality benefit.
Starting colonoscopy screening at 45 (vs 50) prevents enough early-onset cancers to justify the population cost.
Multi-cancer liquid-biopsy tests like Galleri detect early cancers at a stage that meaningfully improves survival.