The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
but the majority of what's happening is a disease that leads to plaque formation inside of coronary arteries and we can go as deep or as shallow as you want into that and why that happens and how that's a function of endothelial injury lipoprotein burden and inflammation but this leads to a reduction in blood flow to uh key parts of the heart muscle and when that happens the heart undergos an es schic event
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.