The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's undeniably well established the relationship between inflammation and cardiovascular disease you could take two people that have virtually an identical profile of lipoproteins but in one group the high amount of inflammation will lead to a greater burden of disease than in the other inflammation plays an important role in cancer and certainly inflammation plays an important role in alzheimer's disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.