Andrew Huberman· PhD
And we saw without any ambiguity that cardiovascular disease is already taking hold in people who are 18, 19, 20-years-old.
The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
And we saw without any ambiguity that cardiovascular disease is already taking hold in people who are 18, 19, 20-years-old.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
because we know from autopsy studies of teenagers the process begins then i mean it probably begins even younger but we don't have too many autopsies of people below the teen years but certainly autopsies of people in their late teens and early 20s who have died for other reasons already show foam cells fatty streaks in some cases
we know from autopsy studies of military personnel who unfortunately get killed in their job that these young men many of them robust in great shape have subclinical atherosclerosis but none of them are dropping dead of heart attacks while they're serving in the military with rare exception