The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
these people don't have diabetes but they have metabolic dysfunction because they have elevated free fatty acids and they have insulin resistance they become metabolically broken due to something completely different than ldl so that's a very interesting thing as well which i think actually ties it all together that's what i'm arguing for at least that it's the context it's the insulin resistance which is really better described as metabolic dysfunction that is driving this
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
at the very very very beginning of all of it is not elevated ldl is not elevated cholesterol it is metabolic dysfunction aka insulin resistance
insulin resistance is at the center of atherosclerosis as well that is what i believe causes atherosclerosis at the very very very beginning of all of it is not elevated ldl is not elevated cholesterol it is metabolic dysfunction aka insulin resistance