The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we must develop insulin resistance not that we want to develop insulin resistance but a human must develop insulin resistance aka metabolic dysfunction for that endothelial dysfunction to persist and for that ldl to become wrapped up in an atherosclerotic plaque
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
i think that what happens generally is that we must develop insulin resistance not that we want to develop insulin resistance but a human must develop insulin resistance aka metabolic dysfunction for that endothelial dysfunction to persist and for that ldl to become wrapped up in an atherosclerotic plaque