The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are longer-term effects with this virus and it should be taken seriously i mean i think when the administration's occasionally says things like you need to embrace this virus or live with kind of you know this kind of notion that the virus would eliminate itself by population-induced immunity which has never happened for a virus before i think they sort of ignore the fact about the long-term measures of this particular virus this isn't flu
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.