Paul Saladino· MD
Not only was vioxx not a better drug but it was a significantly worse drug so that one out of 40 people who took vioxx had a serious adverse event
Loading…
We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
Not only was vioxx not a better drug but it was a significantly worse drug so that one out of 40 people who took vioxx had a serious adverse event
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.