We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
unhealthy user bias was clearly at play but it didn't actually confound the results because the people who ate less margarine the people that were not listening to mainstream Health advice were people who were smoking more drinking more and had more unhealthy behaviors this is unhealthy user bias but in this study the results the dangers of the margarine were so strong that outweighed all of those other unhealthy behaviors they were doing
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.