The evidence is convergent. Multiple independent sources reach the same conclusion, the underlying mechanism is well-characterized, and even the field's most cautious voices treat it as worth doing.
if people and indigenous populations and this is a broad sweeping statement if people into new spots populations make it to the age of 50 they have the same life expected as us with squaring of the morbidity curve meaning they don't get chronic disease
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
in hunter-gatherer societies it's clearly a squaring of the morbidity curve i know we talked about this in the first podcast and it's clearly a dearth of chronic disease that's contributing to that that persistence of vitality
hunter-gatherers today they are free from chronic disease and they live as long as us if they make it out of childhood which is a higher infant mortality and childhood mortality for them which skews their life expectancy but they have an adult lifespan an adult health span which dwarfs ours and their life expectancy is the same as ours even without any of the fancy medical care we have and they have a health span that is vitality span that dwarfs hours
but these people are very healthy they don't have cardiovascular disease and in any amount like we do they don't have cancers they don't have dementias they don't have chronic diseases they don't have Lupus they don't have rheumatoid arthritis these are not even you know they don't exist these surveys have been done over and over and over