The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
for example one of the St studies entitled oral highd do multivitamins and minerals after mitochondial infarction required that the subject took six pills a day for 4 and a half years with no real biochemical data at any point throughout the study it's difficult to know whether any of these subjects were really compl client over the course of 4 and 1/2 years
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.