We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
virtually across every major data set you do find greater all-cause mortality not just lung cancer all cause mortality with greater use of smoking and not by like the little hazard ratios of like say 1.3 and so forth we're talking you know two hundred four hundred percent I mean or sorry two thousand four thousand percent I believe it's it's really way out there
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.