The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
Tukisenta population papua new guinea you guys can see the reference here you can read it yourself very low evidence of cardiomyopathy hypertension coronary heart disease rarely seen among the indigenous population these people eat a heck of a lot of carbohydrates
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
what you'll see here is that there is essentially no real vascular disease in any of these populations