The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
obviously if there is some underlying heart or a cardiac sensitivity or issue the tacky cardia itself can be a problem I mean So like um you know if someone has like an underlying heart condition where at rest it may not present itself but the shifts into that kind of beating faster to compensate for the fact that you've got a drop on blood pressure um can do put strain on the heart in a way that could unmask a vulnerability or an event
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
but as a consequence of the Vaso dilation is it triggers Tachi cardia which is an accelerated heart rate and so that's a very reliable physiological response for a lot of people who use cannabis