The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's possible to have um normal seamen volume and have very low sperm count right we're not talking about the total amount of ejaculate per se we're talking about the density of forwardly motile healthy non-dna fragmented sperm in that at seen right so in other words it's not sufficient to just um assume because uh you can ejaculate that your sperm are healthy
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.