We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
it's still really disheartening to me to see that these women who have very high genetic risk are not being treated because of concerns about pregnancy which you can talk about are management around there but it's better to even have short interruptions in treatment than to let these women who have genetically High very high ldls be marinating in this athergenesis for decades and decades untreated which you know Dooms them to earlier onset morbidity and mortality if not treated
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.