Peter Attia· MD
and if your non-hdl is low yes you'll get some gains starting at 35 but it's not a lot it's actually quite small your gain is in the people with a high non-hdl
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and if your non-hdl is low yes you'll get some gains starting at 35 but it's not a lot it's actually quite small your gain is in the people with a high non-hdl
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
there's about 20 percent of the population is is it demand is that evident high risk and they should consider it and part of the information they need to know is how much do i gain now how much is gained now versus how much is lost by waiting