The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
the problem with that is it it doesn't take into account how many particles make up that that density of LDL is just giving us sort of a weight of LDL particles if we're talking about LDL but it's not telling us how many particles that is
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the LDL number comes back at 140 milligrams per deciliter is that actually what it is or is that an estimation that's an estimation it's almost always a calculation and there are at least eight different methods to calculate LDL cholesterol so if there are eight different methods they don't all give the same answer or you wouldn't have eight different methods