The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
those are synonymous go above 60 milligrams per deciliter up from baseline or even more and stay elevated for three hours four hours from what we have seen with endothelial function that type of a post cranial elevation of glucose is probably impairing endothelial function it's probably causing the glycocalyx on the inside of our blood vessels to miss function and it's probably not a very healthy thing for us to have happening
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
we know that these median amplitude who Coast excursions postprandial e meaning how high the blood sugar ramps up after you eat can affect the endothelium and many other vascular markers in the negative way
and that we know that postprandial elevation in blood glucose you know you know these mean amplitude glucose excursions appear to be pretty damaging to the endothelium and like a calyx