The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
In terms of other environmental pollutants that are now gaining more and more interest, it's plastic. - Mm-hmm. - Micro and nanoplastics. They are everywhere. Long-term effects of that are unknown. We have performed a study where we exposed sensory hair cells to micro and nanoplastics. In fact, we exposed the entire inner ear, and it was striking to see that they were preferentially taken up by hair cells.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.