The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's not antibodies that probably matter it's neutralizing antibodies and frankly we don't have commercial tests for that so i don't know how much it matters that your serology test that's measuring igg and igm levels over time is changing when that's not actually or certainly not necessarily the thing that we care about we care about neutralizing antibodies not antibodies
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.