The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
we'd still have the elderly dying just because you know your lungs are sort of it when you're in your 80s and 90s and if you've been a smoker or you know just being old the lungs are not as healthy or robust and able to handle any kind of infection and so you know it can be fatal to have any kind of pneumonia when you're over some thresholds
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.