The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so basically I was probably around 260 something total in milligrams of Kyle was actually let me just think for I was almost 4 so around 150 155 LDL and maybe around 55 or 58 HDL and triglycerides approximately a hundred and thirty I think so again I'm converting here but that kind of profile so my LDL would be seen as quite high
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
and so you had a panel with a high LDL quote-unquote around 150 and a triglyceride to HDL ratio that was 2 and a half which is pretty elevated