The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
you're able to see this okay like for example i'm highlighting my particle count yeah right well i'm going to take it a step further and you can see the correlation between these two data sets the correlation between last year's three uh numbers and this year's three numbers in all the three phases is a 0.98 in the pearson super super tight same thing with ldl cholesterol
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.