Direct evidence is thin. The claim is plausible and aligns with adjacent findings, but there isn't yet a body of high-quality work that would let us call it well-supported on its own terms.
A: It’s not yet know but this could be the clue to susceptibility we are all waiting for. Theories include previous exposure to a similar coronavirus, a genetic predisposition to an overactive immune and/or blood clotting system, genetic differences in the ACE2 gene that the virus needs for entry, or underlying health issues that are not yet diagnosed.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.