Peter Attia· MD
At the end of the day, emotional health is so important at any age. Living a long life that's miserable would be the ultimate purgatory, right? You've got to be happy.
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
At the end of the day, emotional health is so important at any age. Living a long life that's miserable would be the ultimate purgatory, right? You've got to be happy.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
now in people who are younger than 60 can this give you extra information if you're on the cusp of saying should you be treated or not and i think the answer is yes if you or the patient says i want more information i'm not convinced that i personally are in a situation where i should be taking medications and you have a positive coronary calcium i think that can be extremely helpful
in the older patient the positive score is not very informative