The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
We're going to talk about what this means in terms of coordination of neural circuits in the brain and neural circuits in the body, and the organs such as the heart, but also the lungs and other organs of the body, and what this means for changing one's overall state.
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
What this study found is that different subjects listening to the same story, undergo the same variation in heart rate. In other words, the gaps between their heartbeats start to resemble one another in response to the same story. Now, this is very interesting. This is a coordination of the physiology of the body in response to a narrative, a story in different people. And yet when they line up the heart rates of these different people who listen to the story at completely different times, they find that those heart rates map onto one another almost identically.
In my mind, there was no reason why the results had to be this way. Two people listen to the same story, why should their heart rates be almost identical to the same story? Very, very interesting and points to the power of narrative and story in coordinating our physiology.