The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
so basically what it is is dilated veins in the scrotum um so obviously we need veins to get blood out of the testicles um but sometimes they can be a little larger than average and there's sort of a normal sort of thermal regulation so if the veins get too big it's thought to warm up the testicle the other thought is that it doesn't adequately clear some of the metabolites um so exact the pathophysiology is you know somewhat debated but I think those probably contribute
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.