The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and and there it's actually quite a common treatment to try to undercorrect and ask people to exercise and not just give a prism that says hey if your eyes in sometime we'll use a prism so the light sort of looks right to you but rather undercorrect that and sort of really force you to exercise trying to yoke your two eyes straight together
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.