Paul Saladino· MD
there are tons of studies that show the same number of people have heart attacks with an LDL of 90 milligrams per deciliter as a hundred and seventy milligrams per deciliter there's it's not a good predictor
Loading…
The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
there are tons of studies that show the same number of people have heart attacks with an LDL of 90 milligrams per deciliter as a hundred and seventy milligrams per deciliter there's it's not a good predictor
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
the studies you know almost every study that has been done that lowers LDL cholesterol has definitely proven to have better outcomes than than not so um that's kind of my stance
the studies you know almost every study that has been done that lowers LDL cholesterol has definitely proven to have better outcomes than than not