The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
this was established really clearly through the Sprint trial and and this has basically been now kind of the gold standard for how we use an automated cuff so that trial was done by um having individuals sit for 5 minutes check a blood pressure no stimulation during that time so not talking not looking at a phone not doing anything and then repeat that two more times so it's a 15
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.