The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
and young buckles like like Dave Feldman and yourself you know on people who are healthy and know they're healthy well they can certainly go with the evidence and say no I don't think this is a problem I'm just gonna watch over the years yeah watch it carefully you know I think we just watch carefully and and see what happens
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.