We can't find evidence that holds up here. Proponents are reasoning from mechanism or analogy rather than direct human data, and the most credible skeptics raise objections we can't dismiss.
only the experimental group was instructed to avoid trans fats while the control group lightly consumed significant amounts of trans fats so again poorly constructed trial because the control group was likely consuming more trans fats and this was a multifactorial intervention
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.
this means that the control group had significantly higher trans fat than the experimental group how anyone could consider the National Diet heart study to be valid is beyond me