The headline is broadly defensible, but the qualifications matter. Effect sizes vary by population, the strongest claims rest on shorter trials, and credible voices push back on how it's typically framed.
it's the the the artherosclerosis and Cardio vascular disease is kind of like a cake there's a lot of ingredients that have to go into this to have the effect instead of just wouldn't just say oh it's just the frosting on the cake that's causing the problem because that's what we see it's like no there's multiple pieces going into making this problem and we need to understand those pieces all together
Every Sunday: the week’s new conflicts and verdict changes — and nothing else.
Native comments, Twitter mentions, and Reddit threads about this claim — surfaced together so the conversation isn't fragmented across platforms.
Bookmarking — the dossier-vs-overview split is the right call. Most of the time I want overview; sometimes I want receipts.
Would love a "what would change this verdict" RSS feed. Sign me up if it exists.